Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/926/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income...

Itxa/926/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ltu v. M/S Airline Financial Support Services (India) Ltd

High Court 27 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/926/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ltu v. M/S Airline Financial Support Services (India) Ltd
Date of order
27 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/926/2017 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax - Ltu v. M/S Airline Financial Support Services (India) Ltd, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 6.In the light of the above, the present appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn in terms of the above Circular.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Sonali Kilaje 9-ITXA-926-17.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 926 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax - LTU v/s. M/s. Airline Financial Support Services (India) Ltd. .... Appellant Respondent Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant. CORAM: UJJAL BHUYAN, & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ. P. C.:- DATE : JANUARY 27, 2020. 1.Heard Mr. Tejveer Singh, learned standing counsel revenue forthe appellant. 2.This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961has been preferred by the revenue against the order dated31.05.2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BenchMumbai in ITA Nos.2547 & 2549/Mum/2012 for the assessmentyears 2003-04 & 2001-02. 3.It is seen that the tax effect in the appeal is Rs.21,49,140/-. Inview of Circular No.17 of 2019 of Government of India, Ministry ofFinance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes(CBDT) dated 08.08.2019, the monetary limit for filing of appeal bythe Department before the High Court has been enhanced to Rs.1Crore. 4.In other words, no appeal will be filed by the Departmentbefore the High Court where the tax effect is less than Rs.1 Croreand in case appeal has been filed, the same would stand withdrawnsubject to the conditions mentioned in the said Circular. 5.Mr. Singh, learned standing counsel revenue for the appellantsubmits that he has not received any instructions from thedepartment. 6.In the light of the above, the present appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn in terms of the above Circular. 7.Court fee to be refunded as per rules. (MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan