Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/931/2009 Of Director Of Income Tax...

Itxa/931/2009 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. H.b.zachry Company Limited

High Court 07 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/931/2009 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. H.b.zachry Company Limited
Date of order
07 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/931/2009 Of Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation) v. H.b.zachry Company Limited, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2490 OF 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (LOD) NO.2490 OF 2007 Director of Income Tax (International Taxation) ..Appellant. V/s. H.B.Zachry Co. Ltrd. ..Respondent. Mr.Parag Vyas for appellant. None for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MAY, 2009. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is fairly covered against the revenue in the judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1037 of 2008 C.I.T. V/s. M/s. NGC Network Asia LLC decided on 14th January, 2009 (unreported). In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law is involved in the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan