Itxa/93/2003 Of M/S Kumar Combines v. Income-Tax Officer Ward- 3 (2),Pune
High Court
07 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/93/2003 Of M/S Kumar Combines v. Income-Tax Officer Ward- 3 (2),Pune
Date of order
07 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Itxa/93/2003 Of M/S Kumar Combines v. Income-Tax Officer Ward- 3 (2),Pune, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed in limine.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.93 OF 2003
M/s. Kumar Combines .. Appellant.
V/s.
Income-tax Officer,
Ward 3(2), Pune .. Respondent.
Mr.P.Y. Vaidya for the appellant.
Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with V.H. Kantharia i/b. P.
Kapur for the respondent.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 7TH OCTOBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Having heard the learned counsel for the
assessee, we are satisfied that the findings recorded
by the Tribunal are concluded on facts and do not
give rise to any question of law much less the
substantial question of law.
2. The appeal is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue