In Itxa/941/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Taxcity-5,Mum v. M/S Johnson And Johnson Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.941 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Johnson & Johnson Ltd.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr.Subhash S. Shetty for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 6TH JULY, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the respondent. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in this appeal is squarely covered by the judgment reported in Berger Paints India Ltd. V/s. CITreported in 266 I.T.R. 99. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in this appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue