Itxa/94/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay,City Vi v. Aarti Drugs Ltd
High Court
21 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/94/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay,City Vi v. Aarti Drugs Ltd
Date of order
21 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/94/2003 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay,City Vi v. Aarti Drugs Ltd, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Decision: We accept his statement and allow the appeal to be withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.94 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax-
VI, Mumbai .. Appellant.
V/s.
M/s.Aarti Drugs Limited .. Respondent.
Mr.R. Asokan i/b. K.B. Rao for the appellant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2004.
P.C. :
Mr.R. Asokan, the learned counsel for the
revenue submits that in view of the judgment of the
Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income
Tax V/s. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co. Ltd. [261 ITR
275], he has instructions to withdraw this appeal.
2. We accept his statement and allow the
appeal to be withdrawn.
3. Refund of court fee as per law.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue