Case Law › High Court › Itxa/963/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Inco...

Itxa/963/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 14 Mumbai v. M/S Indian Seamless Steels And Alloys Ltd

High Court 02 Sep 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

02 Sep 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Itxa/963/2017 Of Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax 14 Mumbai v. M/S Indian Seamless Steels And Alloys Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1020 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai ….Appellant V/s. M/s. Indian Seamless Steels & Alloys Ltd. ….Respondents WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.963 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai ….Appellant V/s. M/s. Indian Seamless Steels & Alloys Ltd. ….Respondents WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1023 OF 2017 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14, Mumbai ….Appellant V/s.M/s. Indian Seamless Steels & Alloys Ltd. ….Respondents ---- Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.Ms. Jasmin Amalsadwala i/b. PDS Legal for respondents. ---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, & ABHAY AHUJA, JJ DATED : 2[nd] SEPTEMBER 2021 P.C. : 1Mr. Suresh Kumar states that since Form 5 indicating that theorder for full and final settlement of tax arrears under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act has been paid is issued, appellant be permitted to withdrawthe appeals. 2Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees, ifany, in accordance with rules. 3 All to act on authenticated copy of this order. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.