Itxa/980/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai-Xii v. Mahendra M.mehta
High Court
06 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/980/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai-Xii v. Mahendra M.mehta
Date of order
06 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/980/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Mumbai-Xii v. Mahendra M.mehta, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
* 1/1 *
Rane
Friday, 6.7.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 980 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City-XII….AppellantV/s.Mahendra M. Mehta….Respondent
* * * * *
None for the appellant.Mr. Pankaj Toprani, Advocate for the respondent.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-6[th] JULY, 2018.
P.C. :-
1.None appeared in support of the Appeal when itwas first called out. It was kept back. On being called thesecond time, again none appears in support of the Appeal.
2.
2.It appears, the appellant is not desirous ofprosecuting this Appeal. This particularly in view of thefact that Advocate and parties were put to notice on 22[nd]
June, 2018 that this Appeal would be taken up forconsideration today. Appeal dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue