In Itxa/989/2016 Of Shri Indrakumar Patodia v. Income Tax Officer 24(2) (4), the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Tax appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Priya Soparkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.989 OF 2016
Shri Indrakumar Patodia… Appellant
V/s.
Income Tax Officer 24(2)(4)… Respondent
---
None for the Appellant.None for the Respondent.
---
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND
B.P.COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : JANUARY 08, 2019.
P.C.:-
1.Called out twice. No one is present for the appellant. Tax
appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(B.P.COLABAWALLA,J.)
(AKIL KURESHI,J.)
….
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue