Itxa/99/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16,Mumbai v. M/S Matru Mandir Co.op.hsg Soc. Ltd
High Court
08 May 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/99/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16,Mumbai v. M/S Matru Mandir Co.op.hsg Soc. Ltd
Date of order
08 May 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/99/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax-16,Mumbai v. M/S Matru Mandir Co.op.hsg Soc. Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2987 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2988 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2989 OF 2007WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL (LDG.) NO. 2990 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income-tax.V/s.M/s.Matru Mandir Co-op.Hsg.Soct.Ltd. ... Respondent.
... Appellant.
Anuradha Mane for the applicant.None for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 8th May 2009.
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
.Appellant to remove all office objectionswithin six weeks from today, failing
which,
shall automatically stand dismissed without reference
to the Court.
appeals
2.In the event, objections are removed,
appeal shall be treated as admitted on the following
substantial questions of law.
"Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case and in law, the Tribunal isjustified in law in holding that theAntenna Service charges and hoardingreceived by the assessee society during theAY 1998-99 to 2001-02 are covered under theprovisions of section 80P(2) of the Act?
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue