Itxa/992/2004 Of M/S. Altantic (Firm) v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
15 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/992/2004 Of M/S. Altantic (Firm) v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
15 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Itxa/992/2004 Of M/S. Altantic (Firm) v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Rane* 1/2 * ITXA—992-2004 (SR.96)
Friday, 15.6.2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 992 OF 2004
M/s. Atlantic (Firm)
V/s.
The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome-Tax Range 16(2), Mumbaiand anr.
…..Appellant
….Respondents
* * * * *
None for the appellant.
CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, &
SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.DATE :-15TH JUNE, 2018.
P.C. :-
1. When this Appeal was called out earlier, none
appeared in support of the Appeal. At the bottom of the
board, this Appeal was again called out and again none appears in support of the Appeal.
The parties and advocates had been put to
Rane
* 2/2 * ITXA—992-2004 (SR.96)Friday, 15.6.2018
notice on 30[th] May, 2018 that this matter would be taken up today. Inspite of the above, none appears in support of the Appeal. It appears, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the Appeal. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.