Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shree Krishna Texport And Capital Markets Ltd
High Court
14 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shree Krishna Texport And Capital Markets Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shree Krishna Texport And Capital Markets Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.992 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
M/s. Shree Krishna Texport & Capital Market Ltd...Respondent.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant.
Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, senior Advocate with S.G. Lakhani for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that
the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is already decided by the Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal Nos.993 and 994 of 2007 vide order dated 30th March, 2009 in the case of assessee itself. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The photo copy of the order in Income Tax Appeal Nos.993 & 994 of 2007 is kept on record. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.