Case LawHigh Court › Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shree Krishna Texport And Capital Markets Ltd

High Court 14 Aug 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shree Krishna Texport And Capital Markets Ltd
Date of order
14 Aug 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/992/2007 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Shree Krishna Texport And Capital Markets Ltd, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.992 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant. V/s. M/s. Shree Krishna Texport & Capital Market Ltd...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for appellant. Mr. P.J. Pardiwala, senior Advocate with S.G. Lakhani for respondent. CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 14TH AUGUST, 2009. P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the revenue. He fairly states that the issue sought to be raised in the appeal is already decided by the Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal Nos.993 and 994 of 2007 vide order dated 30th March, 2009 in the case of assessee itself. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in the appeal. The photo copy of the order in Income Tax Appeal Nos.993 & 994 of 2007 is kept on record. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan