Case Law › High Court › Itxa/992/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Inc...

Itxa/992/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S. Lokhandwala Construction Industries Pvt.ltd

High Court 17 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Sep 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Itxa/992/2017 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-12 v. M/S. Lokhandwala Construction Industries Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 992 OF 2017 Commissioner of Income Tax .. Appellant v/s. M/s. Lokhandwala Construction IndustriesPvt. Ltd. .. Respondent Mr. Sham Walve for the appellant None for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & NITIN JAMDAR, J.J. DATED : 30[th] SEPTEMBER, 2019 P.C. 1.Not on board. Mentioned. 2. A praecipe is moved for speaking to the minutes of order dated 17[th] September, 2019. - In the appearance column substitute the name of “Mr.Suresh Kumar” with “Mr. Sham Walve” for the appellant. In the appearance column substitute the name of “Mr. -On page 3, paragraph 5, in the first sentence, substitutethe name of “Mr. Suresh Kumar” with “Mr. Sham Walve” for theappellant. 3.Office to carry out necessary corrections. 4.Application for speaking to the minutes is disposed of. (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.