Ivan Singh v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:23Rd August, 2012
High Court
23 Aug 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
Ivan Singh v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:23Rd August, 2012
Date of order
23 Aug 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ivan Singh v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:23Rd August, 2012, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: Sincethe appeal is partly heard, we deem it appropriate to direct the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Panaji, Goa to dispose of theappeal preferred by the petitioner against the Order dated 12.12.2011 passed by respondent No.1 expeditiously and in any case, on orbefore 28th September, 2012, in...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO. 476 OF 2012
IVAN SINGH ... Petitioner VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX AND 3 ORS., ... Respondents
Mr. J. P. Pardiwalla, Senior Advocate with Ms. Amira A. Razaq,Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 3.
P.C.:-
-Coram:A. P. LAVANDE &U. V. BAKRE, JJ.-Date:23rd August, 2012
Heard Mr. Pardiwalla, learned Senior Counsel for the
petitioner and Ms. Dessai, learned Counsel for respondents No.1 to 3.
2. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the orderdated 12.6.2012, passed by respondent No.1.
3. Mr.Pardiwalla, learned Senior Counsel appearing for thepetitioner submits that the petitioner would not press the reliefclaimed in the present petition in the event, the appeal preferred bythe petitioner on 22.12.2011 against order dated 12.12.2011, passedby respondent No.1 is ordered to be decided within a reasonable time.
Mr. Pardiwalla further submits that the appeal preferred by thepetitioner has been partly heard.
4. Ms. Dessai, learned Counsel appearing for the respondentsdoes not dispute that the appeal has been partly heard and she has no
objection if direction is given to the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals), Panaji, Goa to dispose of the appeal preferred by thepetitioner within a reasonable time.
5. We are of the considered view that the prayer made by Mr.Pardiwalla appearing on behalf of the petitioner is reasonable. Sincethe appeal is partly heard, we deem it appropriate to direct the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Panaji, Goa to dispose of theappeal preferred by the petitioner against the Order dated 12.12.2011 passed by respondent No.1 expeditiously and in any case, on orbefore 28th September, 2012, in accordance with law.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposedof. No order as to costs.
A. P. LAVANDE, J.
ssm.
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.