Case LawHigh Court › J C Bamford Excavators Ltd v. Deputy Dir...

J C Bamford Excavators Ltd v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, Circle -3(1) International Taxation, New Delhi

High Court 20 Nov 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
J C Bamford Excavators Ltd v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, Circle -3(1) International Taxation, New Delhi
Date of order
20 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In J C Bamford Excavators Ltd v. Deputy Director Of Income Tax, Circle -3(1) International Taxation, New Delhi, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~9. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 721/2019 J C BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi, Ms. Husnal Syali Nagi and Mr. Pulkit Verma, Advocates. versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -3(1) INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R% 20.11.2019 Learned counsel for the appellant states that questions „e‟, „c‟ and „d‟ would not survive in view of the dismissal of appeal preferred by the Revenue being dismissed on account of low tax effect. He submits that though all the issues arise, the appellant reserves the right to raise the said issues in subsequent years. The appellant has given instructions not to pursue the present appeal in relation to the said issues in view of the low quantum involved. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. VIPIN SANGHI, J NOVEMBER 20, 2019/kd SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan