J. Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer (International Taxation
High Court
21 Jan 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
J. Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer (International Taxation
Date of order
21 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In J. Mitra & Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Income Tax Officer (International Taxation, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
8. + W.P.(C) 8995/2014
J. MITRA & CO. PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)
& ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Senior Standing counsel with Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.
CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
O R D E R% 21.01.2016
1. The short point in this writ petition is about the Petitioner seeking refund
of excessive tax deducted at source alongwith interest thereupon in relation
to payments made by it to a foreign party.
2. Reliance is placed on Circular No. 7/2007 dated 23[rd] October 2007
(Annexure-13 to the writ petition). It is stated that despite several letters
written to the Department, there has been no response received.
Page 1 of 2
3. Despite notice having been issued in this petition way back on 8[th] January 2015, for more than a year now, a counter affidavit has not even been filed.
4. In the circumstances, the Court considers it appropriate to direct the Department to process the request of the Petitioner in terms of the aforementioned Circular and communicate to the Petitioner not later than three weeks from today and in any event on or before 26[th] February 2016 its decision on the request of the Petitioner. If for some reason the request is rejected it will be open to the Petitioner to revive this petition.
5. The petition is disposed of in the above terms.
S. MURALIDHAR, J
JANUARY 21, 2016/dn
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.