J U D G M E N T v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax. (2008 (4) Klt 782
High Court
28 Jun 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
J U D G M E N T v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax. (2008 (4) Klt 782
Date of order
28 Jun 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In J U D G M E N T v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax. (2008 (4) Klt 782, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2013/7TH ASHADHA, 193
WP(C).No. 12061 of 2013 (G)
----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
1. BCG ESTATES AND BUILDERS PVT. LTD. (ORIGINALLY EVERSHINE PROPERTIES (P) LTD) BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR RENU C. BABU, W/O. BIJOY VARGHESE, 36 YEARS CHANDRATHIL HOUSE, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM (ORIGINALLY EVERSHINE PROPERTIES (P) LTD) BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR RENU C. BABU, W/O. BIJOY VARGHESE, 36 YEARS CHANDRATHIL HOUSE, VENNALA, ERNAKULAM
2. RENU C.BABU AGED 36 YEARS W/O.BIJOY VARGHESE, CHANDRATHIL HOUSE, VENNALA ERNAKULAM W/O.BIJOY VARGHESE, CHANDRATHIL HOUSE, VENNALA ERNAKULAM
BY ADVS.SRI.V.T.RAGHUNATH
SMT.C.V.RAJALAKSHMI
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM 682 030 COLLECTORATE, CIVIL STATION, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM 682 030
2. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LAND ACQUISITION) NATIONAL HIGHWAY NO 3 VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM 682 019 VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM 682 019
3. KOCHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM 682019 BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, VYTTILA, ERNAKULAM 682019
4. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(TDS), CR BUILDINGS,IS PRESS ROAD,KOCHI 682018ROAD,KOCHI 682018
R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. ANITHA RAVINDRAN R BY SRI.K.JAJU BABU,SC,KOCHI METRO RAIL LTD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28-06-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
----------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------
EXT.P1 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF EVERSHINE PROPERTIES(P) LTDLTD
EXT.P2 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF BCG ESTATES,BUILDERS AND HOTELS(P) LTDHOTELS(P) LTD
EXT.P3 LETTER GIVEN BY THE 1ST PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT
EXT.P4 NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONEREXT.P5 NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONEREXT.P6 RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONEREXT.P5 NOTICE ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONEREXT.P6 RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST PETITIONER
EXT.P7 RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 2ND PETITIONER
EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WA 2243 OF 2008
EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 7128/2013
EXT.P11 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 11455/2013
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
---------------------------------------NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A TO JUDGE
SMM
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C)No.12061 of 2013
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
Dated this the 28[th] day of June, 2013
J U D G M E N T
It is conceded that the amount due to the petitionershave already been disbursed without effecting any deductionunder Section 194 LA of the Income Tax Act pursuant to theinterim order passed in the writ petition. Such an exercise isperfectly legal in view of the decision in Info Park, Keralavs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. (2008 (4)KLT 782).
Nothing survives in the writ petition and the same isdisposed of.
V.CHITAMBARESHJUDGE
smm
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.