Case LawHigh Court › J U D G M E N T v. Commissioner Of Incom...

J U D G M E N T v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Andothers [(2013) 263 Ctr (Sc) 129

High Court 18 Dec 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
J U D G M E N T v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Andothers [(2013) 263 Ctr (Sc) 129
Date of order
18 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In J U D G M E N T v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Andothers [(2013) 263 Ctr (Sc) 129, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935 WP(C).No. 30420 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER -------------------------- URUKUNNU SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.Q.190 URUKUNNU P.O., PUNALUR, KOLLAM DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. BY ADV. SRI.ANCHAL C.VIJAYAN RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, TOLL JUNCTION, KOWDIAR P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003. AAYAKKAR BHAVAN, TOLL JUNCTION, KOWDIAR P.O. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695003. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. 3. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT CO-OPERATION (C) DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN-695001. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. RAFEEK.V.K THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-12-2013, ALONG WITH WPC. 29107/2013, WPC. 29116/2013, WPC. 29121/2013, WPC.29130/2013, W.P.C.NO.31667/ 2013 AND CONNECTED CASES,THE COURT ON THE SAMEDAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 30420 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 : `TRUE COPY OF THE AUDIT CERTIFICATE FOR THE YEAR 2012-13 REGARDING THE PETITIONER SOCIETY ISSUED BY THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE AUDIT, KOLLAM, DT.10-9-2013.REGARDING THE PETITIONER SOCIETY ISSUED BY THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF CO-OPERATIVE AUDIT, KOLLAM, DT.10-9-2013. EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE F.NO.002/ITO/INTELL/TVM/SCB/13-14/96 DT.10-9-2013 ISSUED BY R1 TO THE PETITIONER.DT.10-9-2013 ISSUED BY R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST DT.27-9-2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER SOCIETY TO R1.PETITIONER SOCIETY TO R1. EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE VIDE F.NO.PUCB/ADJ/13-14/37 DT.15-10-2013 ISSUED BY R1 TO THE PETITIONER.ISSUED BY R1 TO THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.002/ITO/ITELL/UCB/TVM/13-14/185 DT.25-11-2013.DT.25-11-2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY SMM P.A TO JUDGE V.CHITAMBARESH,J. = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C)Nos.30420, 31667, 29107,29116, 29121 and 29130 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 18[th] day of December, 2013 J U D G M E N T The challenge to similar notices issued by the IncomeTax Department has been turned down by judgment dated12-12-2013 in W.P(C)No.30486/2013 and connected cases.The learned Single Judge has followed the decision of theSupreme Court in Kathiroor Service Co-operative BankLtd. and Others vs. Commissioner of Income Tax andOthers [(2013) 263 CTR (SC) 129]. 2. The Supreme Court has affirmed the decision of theDivision Bench of this Court in Chavassery Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Others vs. Income Tax Officerand Others [(2010) 231 CTR 404 (Ker)]. The opinion ofthe Income Tax Officer is manifest by his conduct in issuingthe notices under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.[See. Dolgobinda Paricha vs. Nimai Charan Misra andOthers (AIR 1959 SC 914)]. 3. The Co-operative Banks should not feel shy to furnishthe information sought by the Income Tax Department in W.P.(C)Nos.30420/2013 and con.cases.2 order to ensure that the transactions of the depositors arewholly transparent. The petitioners are however free to movethe authority for granting extension of time to furnish theparticulars which shall be dealt with in accordance with law. The writ petitions are dismissed. V.CHITAMBARESHJUDGE smm
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan