Case LawHigh Court › Jaganathan Bharath v. Assistant Commissi...

Jaganathan Bharath v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon- Corporate Circle 10 (1), Room

High Court 23 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Jaganathan Bharath v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon- Corporate Circle 10 (1), Room
Date of order
23 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jaganathan Bharath v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Taxnon- Corporate Circle 10 (1), Room, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-06-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 6529 of 2022AND WMP NO. 17711 OF 2022,WMP NO. 6616 OF 2022 Jaganathan Bharath,S/o.Jaganathan, Aged 42 years, No.9, Vivelamamda Street,Ambal Nagar, Chennai- 600 032. Petitioner(s) Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxNon- Corporate Circle 10 (1), Room No.620, Sixth Floor, Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034. Respondent(s) PRAYER:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for an issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in DIN and Notice No. ITBA / AST / S /148 / 2021 - 22 / 1033821428 (1) dated 29.06.2021 on the file of the Respondent relating to A.Y. 2013 - 14 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): For Respondent(s): Ms.S.SriniranjaniMs.S.Premalatha Senior Standing Counsel ORDER When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly, submitted that the relief sought for in the present writ petition has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication. 2.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 23-06-2025 rst Index:Yes/NoSpeaking/Non-speaking orderInternet:YesNeutral Citation:Yes/No To Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Non- Corporate Circle 10 (1), Room No.620, Sixth Floor, Wanaparthy Block, 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai- 600 034. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY J.rst WP No. 6529 of 2022AND WMP NO. 17711 OF 2022,WMP NO. 6616 OF 2022 23-06-2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan