Case Law › High Court › Jagdish Rai Ghai, Khanna v. Income Tax C...

Jagdish Rai Ghai, Khanna v. Income Tax Commissioner And Others

High Court 06 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

06 Mar 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jagdish Rai Ghai, Khanna v. Income Tax Commissioner And Others, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Issue: (Oral) 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in spite of theefforts made he is unable to contact the petitioner to apprise the Court as to whether something survives in the petition or not.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH CWP No.7220 of 2000 (O&M) Decided on : 06.03.2014 Jagdish Rai Ghai, Khanna . . . Petitioner Versus Income Tax Commissioner and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY PRESENT: Mr. Tarun Singhal, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Savita Saxena, Advocatefor the respondents. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in spite of theefforts made he is unable to contact the petitioner to apprise the Court as to whether something survives in the petition or not. 2.In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of asinfructuous with liberty to the petitioner to move an application for revivalof the present petition, in case something survives therein. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE March 06, 2014 sonia (ANITA CHAUDHRY) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.