Jagdish Solanki v. Union Of India
High Court
21 May 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Jagdish Solanki v. Union Of India
Date of order
21 May 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Jagdish Solanki v. Union Of India, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3791/2019
1. Income Tax Contingent Employee’s Union, Income-TaxOffice, Jodhpur. (Association Of Casual Labours OfIncome-Tax, Rajasthan Region).Office, Jodhpur. (Association Of Casual Labours OfIncome-Tax, Rajasthan Region).
2. Jagdish Solanki S/o Shri Lal Chand, Aged About 43 Years,R/o Babu Laxman Singh Colony, Outside Third Pole,Mahamandir, Jodhpur-342001. (President Of The Union).R/o Babu Laxman Singh Colony, Outside Third Pole,Mahamandir, Jodhpur-342001. (President Of The Union).
----PetitionersVersus
1. Union Of India, Through The Finance Secretary, MinistryOf Finance, Department Of Revenue, Government OfIndia, New Delhi-110001.Of Finance, Department Of Revenue, Government OfIndia, New Delhi-110001.
2. Chief Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Paota, C-Road,Jodhpur-342010.Jodhpur-342010.
3. Hina P Shah, Member, Central Administrative Tribunal,Jodhpur - 342001.Jodhpur - 342001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. T.C. GuptaFor Respondent(s): ---For Respondent(s): ---
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
21/05/2019
Learned counsel seeks liberty to withdraw the present writpetition with submission that the concerned aggrieved partynamely, Mr. Jagdish Solanki may be permitted to seek redress byfiling a separate petition.
Liberty granted.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
22-MohitTak/-
(S. RAVINDRA BHAT),CJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.