Case Law › High Court › Jai Prakash Singh v. Principal Commissio...

Jai Prakash Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jamshedpur

High Court 17 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2020

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Jai Prakash Singh v. Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Jamshedpur, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 475 of 2020 Jai Prakash Singh …..... Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Jamshedpur. 2. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Jamshedpur. 3. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur. 4. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1, Jamshedpur. …..... Respondents -------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------- For the Petitioner:Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, AdvocateFor the Respondents:Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate ----------- 2/ 17.02.2020 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner thatpursuant the order dated 11.2.2020 passed in W.P.(T) No. 465 of 2020, thenecessary orders have been passed by the Principal Commissioner ofIncome-tax, Jamshedpur, and accordingly, this writ application hasbecome infructuous. This writ application is, thus, dismissed as infructuous. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr. (Deepak Roshan, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.