Jai Suspension Systems Llp v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-4, And Anr
High Court
01 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Jai Suspension Systems Llp v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-4, And Anr
Date of order
01 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Jai Suspension Systems Llp v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Delhi-4, And Anr, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid and since the grievance no longer survives, the present petition shall stand disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~44
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1335/2023 & CM APPL. 4983/2023(Stay)
JAI SUSPENSION SYSTEMS LLP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sapra, Adv. Through: Mr.Sandeep Sapra, Adv.
%
versus
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, DELHI-4, AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr.SC.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R01.05.2024
1.This writ petition had been initially preferred impugning an order dated 29 December 2022, purported to have been made under Section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act”] in terms of which the assessment was centralised at Lucknow.
2.Subsequently, on 05 February 2024 a fresh order under Section 127(2) of the Act has been made and in terms of which the assessment has been transferred back to DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE- 10(1), Delhi.
3. In view of the aforesaid and since the grievance no longer survives, the present petition shall stand disposed of as having rendered infructuous.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 01, 2024/p
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue