Jainam Investments v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
12 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Jainam Investments v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Jainam Investments v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2780 OF 2019
Jainam Investments
vs.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 8(1) Mumbai & Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
Mr. Madhur Agrawal a/w. Mr. Fenil Bhatt i/b Mr. Atul K. Jasani for thePetitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &
AMIT B. BORKAR, JJ.
DATE : 12[th] OCTOBER 2021
P. C. :
After hearing the petition for some time, Mr. Agrawal oninstructions sought leave to withdraw the petition. The petitiondismissed as withdrawn.
2.All rights and contentions of the Petitioner to be raisedbefore the Assessing Officer, who shall pass orders after consideringthe submissions of the petitioner and after giving personal hearing inaccordance with the Rules.
(AMIT B. BORKAR, J)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Digitally signedby RAJESHWARIRAJESHWARISUBODHSUBODHKARVEKARVEDate:2021.10.13
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue