Case LawHigh Court › Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar La...

Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Babasidhnath Bhavan, Lalkothi, Jaipur

High Court 19 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Babasidhnath Bhavan, Lalkothi, Jaipur
Date of order
19 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions), Babasidhnath Bhavan, Lalkothi, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed asrendered infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2586/2015 Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur,through its Secretary. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), BabaSidhnath Bhavan, Lalkothi, Jaipur. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajat SharmaFor Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order 19/02/2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of thesubsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, nocause of action survives for pursuing the petition. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed asrendered infructuous. (SHUBHA MEHTA),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Himanshu/Chandan--24
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan