Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions,Room
High Court
23 Feb 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions,Room
Date of order
23 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions,Room, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed asrendered infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2585/2015
Jaipur Development Authority, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur,Through Its Secretary.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions,Room No. 205, C-95, Baba Sidhnath Bhavan, Lalkothi,Jaipur.Room No. 205, C-95, Baba Sidhnath Bhavan, Lalkothi,Jaipur.
2. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Exemptions, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Sanjay JhanwarFor Respondent(s): Mr.Arjun SinghMr.Anuroop SinghiFor Respondent(s): Mr.Arjun SinghMr.Anuroop Singhi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
23/02/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of thesubsequent developments during pendency of the writ petition, nocause of action survives for pursuing the petition.
In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed asrendered infructuous.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Monika/16
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue