Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & 2 Ors v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
14 Feb 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & 2 Ors v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
14 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & 2 Ors v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the Writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
KJ
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2168 OF 2010
Jairaj Kantilal Sonawala & 2 Ors. )..PetitionersVs.The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. )..Respondents----
Mr. Charanjeet Chandrapal for the petitioners.
Mr. M.R.Prajapati @ Mr.S.R.Bhaloagar for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J. P .DEVADHAR &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,JJ
DATE : 14/2/2011.
PC
1The petitioners are aggrieved by the order of CCIT dated 15.4.2005 whereby the application seeking waiver of interest under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act 1961, has been rejected. The petitioners are also aggrieved by the communication dated 20.12.2004 whereby the petitioner no.1 was informed that the CIT has declined to waive interest levied under Section 220(2) for want of payment of the tax demand that was outstanding.
2As regards waiver of interest levied under Section 234-B of the Income Tax Act 1961, Counsel for the petitioners does not press the said claim in view of dismissal of earlier Writ Petition bearing No.919 of 2006 and also dismissal of the Review Petition bearing No. Lodging-60 of 2010 on 7.2.2011.
3As regards communication dated 20.12.2004 is concerned, the grievance of the petitioners is that the outstanding tax demand has already been paid to the Income Tax Department. If that be so, as per the impugned letter dated 12.12.2004, the petitioners were entitled to make a fresh application seeking waiver of interest levied under Section 220(2) of the Income Tax Act. In this view of the matter, we see no merit in the Writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.