Case LawHigh Court › Jalandhar v. Sardari La

Jalandhar v. Sardari La

High Court 15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Jalandhar v. Sardari La
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jalandhar v. Sardari La, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 17.09.2024, and therefore shall apply to SLPs/appeals tobe filedgh Court and Tribunal and alsoapply t before the Supreme Court, Hio the appeals pending before the Supreme Court, High Courtand Tribunal, which have been directed 3.In view of aforesaid Circular No.09/202edoes nclause of Circular No.5/2...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ITA-15-2022 (O[&M)] Page 1 of 3 288-21 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJACHANDIGARB AND HARYANA AT H *** ITA-15-2022 (O&M)Date of Decision: 15.10.2024 PR. COMMIS, , JALANDHAR . . . . Appellant Vs. SARDARI LA . . . . Respondent **** CORAM: HHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALO JEEV PRAKASH SHARMAK JAIN **** Present: Mg Counsel ff N **** SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1.Counsein terms of the Circular bearingNo.9/20by the Government of India,Ministrl for the appellant submits that 24 dated 17.09.2024 issued y of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of DirectTaxes, the monetary limits for filing of the appeals by the departmentbefore the ITAT, High Court and SLPs/Appeals before the SupremeCourt Circular No.5/2024 has beenamendehave been enhanced and the d and following steps have been taken with the purpose tomanage litigations: [&M)] Page 2 of 3 “ 2. As a step towards manhas been decided by the Board to reagement of litigation, it vise the monetary limits focases as stated in Para 4r filing of appeals in Income-tax .1 of the aforementioned Circular 3. Monetary limits given in pregard to filing appeal/SLP shall beincluding those relating to TDS/TCAct, 1961 with exceptions as perCircular No 5/2024 dated 15.03.20to appeal/file SLP shall be taken onto the tax effect and the monetary liaragraph 2 above with applicable to all cases S under the Income-tax paras 3.1 and 3.2 of 24, where the decision merits, without regard mits.” 2.The modifications have come into effect from the date of issuance ofCircular i.e. 17.09.2024, and therefore shall apply to SLPs/appeals tobe filedgh Court and Tribunal and alsoapply t before the Supreme Court, Hio the appeals pending before the Supreme Court, High Courtand Tribunal, which have been directed 3.In view of aforesaid Circular No.09/202edoes nclause of Circular No.5/2024,learnedot fall within the exception counsel prays for withdrawal of 4.Accordingly, we allow the prayer as abdas withdrawn. Page 3 of 3 5.All pending applications also stand disp posed of accordingly. October 15, 2024 parul 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Wheth er reportable? (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan