Case LawHigh Court › Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner...

Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii

High Court 20 Dec 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii
Date of order
20 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 903 of 2021 In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 7247 of 2021 ========================================================== JAMADAR TRAVELS THROUGH PARTNER MEHMOOD PRITAMSINHJAMADAR Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III ========================================================== Appearance: MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Applicant(s) No. 1MR.VARUN K.PATEL(3802) for the Respondent(s) No. 1========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIandHONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE Date : 20/12/2021 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI) 1.This application is preferred seeking the condonation of delay of 898 days in filing the F/Tax Appeal No. 7247 of 2021. 2.According to the applicant, this delay has been causedbecause the applicant was busy pursuing the MiscellaneousApplication for rectification. 3.We have heard learned advocate Mr. Vora appearing forthe applicant and learned Senior Standing Counsel Mr. VarunPatel for the respondent. 4.It appears that the order under challenge is of dated 20.04.2017. The Miscellaneous Application came to bepreferred on 23.10.2017. What is sought to be explained bythe applicant is that of course the statutory period for theappeal was over, however, the period of limitation forpreferring Miscellaneous Application is 4 years. The order ofTribunal in Miscellaneous Application came on 14.12.2020.The present Tax Appeal is preferred on 09.03.2021 which iswell within the time specified under the statute. 5.As the applicant was litigating before the Tribunal andhad a genuine reason not to approach this Court before09.03.2021, which is within the statutory time period, thedelay caused is sufficiently explained and therefore, the Courtis inclined to accede to the request of condoning the same. 6.The present Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. 7.Once the appeal is registered, the same shall be listedfor admission.for admission. (SONIA GOKANI, J) (NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan