Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii
High Court
15 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii
Date of order
15 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Jamadar Travels Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2426 of 2022
In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 7045 of 2021
==========================================================
JAMADAR TRAVELS THROUGH PARTNER MEHMOOD PRITAMSINHJAMADAR Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR. HARDIK V VORA(7123) for the Applicant(s) No. 1MR VARUN K PATEL (3802) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIand
HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MAUNA M. BHATT
Date : 15/11/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
1. This application is preferred seekingthe condonation of delay of 898 days infiling the F/Tax Appeal No.7045 of 2021.
2. According to the applicant, this delayhas been caused because the applicant wasbusy pursuing the Miscellaneous Applicationfor rectification.
3. We have heard learned advocate Mr. Voraappearing for the applicant and learned
Senior Standing Counsel Mr.Varun Patel forthe respondent, who has waived the serviceof notice of Rule.
4. It appears that the order underchallenge is of dated 20.04.2017. TheMiscellaneous Application came to bepreferred on 17.10.2017. What is sought tobe explained by the applicant is that ofcourse the statutory period for the appealwas over, however, the period of limitationfor preferring Miscellaneous Application is4 years. The order of Tribunal inMiscellaneous Application came on14.12.2020. The present Tax Appeal ispreferred on 09.03.2021 which is wellwithin the time specified under thestatute.
5. As the applicant was litigating beforethe Tribunal and had a genuine reason notto approach this Court before 09.03.2021,which is within the statutory time period,the delay caused is sufficiently explained
and therefore, the Court is inclined toaccede to the request of condoning thesame.
6. The present Civil Application isdisposed of accordingly.
7. Once the appeal is registered, the sameshall be listed for admission.
(SONIA GOKANI, J)
M.M.MIRZA
(MAUNA M. BHATT,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.