Case LawHigh Court › Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v....

Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v. The Income Tax Officerexemptions Ward (3),Chennai

High Court 22 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v. The Income Tax Officerexemptions Ward (3),Chennai
Date of order
22 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v. The Income Tax Officerexemptions Ward (3),Chennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: No case is made out for admission. ______________ Page 2 of 4 The tax case appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

T.C.A.No.178 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.09.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN T.C.A.No.178 of 2025 Janaki Thangam Educational TrustPlot No.9, Santhanasrinivasa Perumal Koil Street, TNHB Special Scheme, Mogappair West, Chennai – 600037. Appellant Vs The Income Tax OfficerExemptions Ward (3),Chennai. Respondent PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai dated 9.4.2025 in ITA No.430/Chny/2025. For Appellant:Mrs.G Vardini Karthik For Respondent:Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel ______________ Page 1 of 4 JUDGMENT (Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) We find that assailing the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, this appeal has been filed proposing several questions of law. 2. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that, as a matter of law, there was no delay in filing appeal in view of the provisions contained in the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020. 3. We find that the issue is now being raised for the first time before this court. The ITAT only remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). We leave it open for the appellant to raise all submissions as available under law before the CIT(A). No case is made out for admission. ______________ Page 2 of 4 The tax case appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 22.09.2025 Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi To: 1. The Assistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras. 2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal Addl/JCIT(A)-7, Mumbai 3. The Income Tax Officer, Exemptions Ward (3), Chennai. ______________ Page 3 of 4 ______________ Page 4 of 4 T.C.A.No.178 of 2025 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J. (sasi) T.C.A.No.178 of 2025 22.09.2025
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan