Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v. The Income Tax Officerexemptions Ward (3),Chennai
High Court
22 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v. The Income Tax Officerexemptions Ward (3),Chennai
Date of order
22 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Janaki Thangam Educational Trustplot v. The Income Tax Officerexemptions Ward (3),Chennai, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: No case is made out for admission. ______________ Page 2 of 4 The tax case appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
T.C.A.No.178 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.09.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICEAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN
T.C.A.No.178 of 2025
Janaki Thangam Educational TrustPlot No.9, Santhanasrinivasa Perumal Koil Street, TNHB Special Scheme, Mogappair West, Chennai – 600037.
Appellant
Vs
The Income Tax OfficerExemptions Ward (3),Chennai.
Respondent
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Chennai dated 9.4.2025 in ITA No.430/Chny/2025.
For Appellant:Mrs.G Vardini Karthik
For Respondent:Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel
______________
Page 1 of 4
JUDGMENT
(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We find that assailing the order of the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal, this appeal has been filed proposing several questions of law.
2. During the course of argument, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that, as a matter of law, there was no delay in filing appeal in view of the provisions contained in the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020.
3. We find that the issue is now being raised for the first time before this court. The ITAT only remanded the matter to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). We leave it open for the appellant to raise all submissions as available under law before the CIT(A). No case is made out for admission.
______________
Page 2 of 4
The tax case appeal is dismissed. There shall be no order as to
costs.
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J)
22.09.2025
Index: Yes/NoNeutral Citation:Yes/Nosasi
To:
1. The Assistant Registrar
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Madras.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal
Addl/JCIT(A)-7, Mumbai
3. The Income Tax Officer,
Exemptions Ward (3), Chennai.
______________
Page 3 of 4
______________
Page 4 of 4
T.C.A.No.178 of 2025
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE ANDG.ARUL MURUGAN,J.
(sasi)
T.C.A.No.178 of 2025
22.09.2025
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.