Janardan Raghunath Kapse v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Nasik & Anr
High Court
03 Sep 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Janardan Raghunath Kapse v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Nasik & Anr
Date of order
03 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Janardan Raghunath Kapse v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Nasik & Anr, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.Both these appeals are, therefore, disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
suresh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.383 OF 2016
Janardan Raghunath Kapse
Vs.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle-1, Nasik & Anr.
.... Appellant
.... Respondents
AND
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.384 OF 2016
Smt. Aruna Janardan Kapse
.... Appellant
Vs.Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, Nasik & Anr..... Respondents
Ms Deepa Khare i/by Mint & Confreres for the Appellantin both appeals.Mr. Sham Walve for Respondent No.1 in both appeals.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI &B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 03, 2018
P.C:
1.The appellants' Advocate, on instructions, states that
these appeals are rendered infructuous on account of subsequent
Page 1 of 2
suresh
19-20-ITXA-383.2016.doc
developments, and particularly because the Tribunal recalled its
earlier common order which has been impugned in these
appeals.
2.Both these appeals are, therefore, disposed of as
infructuous.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Digitally signedSureshby SureshJagdishJagdishSajnawatDate:Sajnawat2018.09.0513:35:21 +0530
Page 2 of 2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue