Jankalyan Vinimay Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1),Kolkata & Ors
High Court
27 Jul 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_appellate_side
Parties
Jankalyan Vinimay Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1),Kolkata & Ors
Date of order
27 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Jankalyan Vinimay Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(1),Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
27.7.2021 ks WPA 11284 of 2021 sl. 19
Jankalyan Vinimay Private Limited
Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1),Kolkata & Ors.
Ms. Manju Agarwal,Ms. B. Manot
… For the Petitioner.
Mr. Dhiraj Kumar Trivedi,
Mr. Manabendranath Bandopahdyay … For the Respondents.
In this writ petition, the petitioner has made severalprayers and challenging the impugned AssessmentOrder in question and demand notices and also raisinggrievance against the sitting over its application filedbefore the respondent/Assessing Officer under Section220(6) of the of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Now, thepetitioner submits that the petitioner does not want topress the legality of Assessment Orders in this writpetition since those are the subject matter of appealbefore the Appellate Authority. The petitioner’s prayeris now confined to the relief of directing the AssessingOfficer to dispose of the petitioner’s application underSection 220(6) of the Act relating to the relevantAssessment Year.
I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition forthe relief of direction upon the Assessing Officer toconsider the petitioner’s application under Section220(6) of the Act, which was filed in September, 2018
and the petitioner has filed this writ petition in July,2021 without explaining the delay in approaching thisCourt, if at all the petitioner was so seriouslyprejudiced by the demand notices raised in 2018.Instead of approaching this Writ Court, the petitionershould have taken steps for expediting the pendingappeal in question arising out of the impugnedAssessment Order and the demand.
Accordingly, finding no merit in the writ petition,this writ petition being WPA 11284 of 2021 isdismissed. However, dismissal of this writ petition willnot prevent the petitioner from taking suitable stepsfor expeditious disposal of the appeal before theAppellate Authority.
( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.