Jas Forwarding Worldwide Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 4(1) Delhi
High Court
04 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Jas Forwarding Worldwide Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 4(1) Delhi
Date of order
04 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Jas Forwarding Worldwide Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 4(1) Delhi, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~17 & 18
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 203/2023
JAS FORWARDING WORLDWIDE PVT LTD
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Udit Naresh and Mr. Himanshi Aggarwal, Advs. Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Udit Naresh and Mr. Himanshi Aggarwal, Advs.
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4(1) DELHI ..... Respondent
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Sr.SC with Mr. Shivendra Singh Jr. SC along with Mr. Namit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh Jr. SC along with Mr. Namit Gupta, Adv.
18+ ITA 204/2023
JAS FORWARDING WORLDWIDE PVT LTD ..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Udit Naresh and Mr. Himanshi Aggarwal, Advs. Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr. Vaibhav Kulkarni, Mr. Udit Naresh and Mr. Himanshi Aggarwal, Advs.
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 4(1) DELHI ..... Respondent
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Sr.SC with Mr. Shivendra Singh Jr. SC along with Mr. Namit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Shivendra Singh Jr. SC along with Mr. Namit Gupta, Adv.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
%
O R D E R04.04.2024
1.We are informed by Mr. Vohra, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that the solitary question which arises for consideration is question no.(iii) which has been formulated as follows:
“(iii) Whether the Tribunal erred on law and in the facts of the case in recording that there was concession by the Counsel for the Appellant for remand of the issue to the file of the AO?”
2.However, it appears that during the pendency of the instant appeals, and pursuant to the order of remand as framed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [“ITAT”], the matter has been decided by the Assessing Officer as well as the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the appeal has reached the ITAT in the second round.
3.In that view of the matter, we dispose of these two appeals leaving all questions of law open to be addressed in the proceedings pending before the ITAT.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
APRIL 04, 2024/p
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.