Jasdeep Singh Bains v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala And Others
High Court
11 Sep 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Jasdeep Singh Bains v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala And Others
Date of order
11 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Jasdeep Singh Bains v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala And Others, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
113
Civil Writ Petition No.20440 of 2017Date of Decision: 11.09.2017
Jasdeep Singh Bains
Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Patiala and others
... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
$$$$$
Present:Mr. Surinder Garg, Advocate for the petitioner,
$$$$$
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J.(Oral)
The prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 ofthe Constitution of India Is for issuance of a writ In the nature ofmandamus/certiorari for quashing the action of the respondentsvide which the recovery is being effected from the petitioner in viewof the assessment orders dated 28.03.2004 and 11.12.2007(Annexures P-4 & P-6) respectively, passed by respondent No.2,whereas he has left the company after one year and therefore, he Isnot liable to pay any amount.
D After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for thepetitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the presentwrit petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail any other alternativeremedy as may be available to him, in accordance with law.
&&&&&&&&
3)Dismissed as withdrawn. It snall, however, be open tothe petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as may be availlabito him, in accordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE
(AMIT RAWAL)september 11, 2017JUDGEsonia gugnanlWhetner speaking/reasoned?Yes/NoWhether reportable’Yes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.