Jashan Textile Mills Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4(2), Mumbai
High Court
11 Jan 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Jashan Textile Mills Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4(2), Mumbai
Date of order
11 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Jashan Textile Mills Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax – 4(2), Mumbai, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.63 OF 2006
Jashan Textile Mills Private Limited
VersusDy. Commissioner of Income Tax – 4(2), Mumbai
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the appellant.Mr.Vimal Gupta for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 11[th] January, 2011.
1.This appeal was admitted on 15[th] October 2008 on the following substantial question of law.
“Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was right in taking the view that the appellant was entitled to deduction under Section 80HHC of the Act on the total income after excluding the deduction available under Section 80IA of the Act ?”
2.Learned counsel on both the sides state that the aforesaid question of law has already been answered by this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010) decided on 10th January 2011 in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
3.The Appeal is disposed off accordingly with a direction to the Tribunal to re-compute the deduction in the light of aforesaid decision of this Court. No order as to costs.
(Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.