Case LawHigh Court › Jashan Textile Mills Pvt.ltd v. The Depu...

Jashan Textile Mills Pvt.ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner

High Court 28 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Jashan Textile Mills Pvt.ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner
Date of order
28 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jashan Textile Mills Pvt.ltd v. The Deputy Commissioner, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.

Decision: Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

( 1 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1662 OF 2005 WRIT PETITION NO.1662 OF 2005 Jashan Textile Mills Pvt.Ltd. .. Petitioner V/s The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 4(2), Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.S.N.Inamdar with Mr.Atul Jasani for Petitioner. Dr.P.Daniel for the Respondents. CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN & J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 28.06.2005. DATE : 28.06.2005. DATE : 28.06.2005. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By this Petition, the Petitioner is basically challenging the notice dated 16.3.2005 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for reopening of the Assessment. It appears that the Respondents by their communication dated 16th June, 2005 had also disclosed the reasons for reopening the Assessment, to which, the Petitioner has sent a detailed reply dated 23rd June, 2005. 2. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct the Respondents to give a personal hearing to the Petitioner and thereafter decide the Petitioner’s case as expeditiously as possible. We make it clear that in the event the order of the Respondent goes adverse to the Petitioner, the assessment proceedings shall stand stayed for a period of three ( 2 ) weeks from the date of communication of the said order to the Petitioner. 3. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms. (S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (J.H.BHATIA J.) (J.H.BHATIA J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan