Case Law › High Court › Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust v. Deputy Co...

Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panvel Circle Dist. Raigad – 410 206 & Ors

High Court 13 Jul 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panvel Circle Dist. Raigad – 410 206 & Ors
Date of order
13 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panvel Circle Dist. Raigad – 410 206 & Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
w5544.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5544 OF 2016 Jawaharlal Nehru Port TrustVs.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Panvel Circle Dist. Raigad – 410 206 & Ors. .. Petitioner. .. Respondents. Mr. Firoz Andhyarujina, Senior Counsel with Mr. Sameer Dalal with Mr. S.G. Lakhani for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar with Ms.Samiksha Karani for the respondents. CORAM : M. S. SANKLECHA &A.K. MENON , JJ. DATED : 13TH JULY, 2016 P.C. : 1.Mr.Andhyarujina, learned Senior Counsel appearing in support of the petition seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach appropriate authorities. 2.Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (A.K. MENON,J.) (M. S. SANKLECHA,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan