Case LawHigh Court › Jay Bharat Bindal Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v....

Jay Bharat Bindal Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 09 Dec 1997 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jay Bharat Bindal Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
09 Dec 1997
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Jay Bharat Bindal Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (1997) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Petition stands disposed of as having been withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 2170 of 1996 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? �( No. 1 to 5 NO ) -------------------------------------------------------------- JAY BHARAT BINDAL SILK MILLS PVT LTD Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR JP SHAH for Petitioner MR MIHIR JOSHI for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE S.D.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE R.K.ABICHANDANI Date of decision: 09/12/97 ORAL JUDGEMENT Per: S.D. Dave, J :- �Ld. Counsel Mr. Shah for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition. The leave is accorded, after hearing Ld. counsel Mr. Shah and Ld. counsel Mr. Mihir Joshi for the Revenue. Petition stands disposed of as having been withdrawn. Rule shall stand discharged. Interim relief shall stand vacated. No costs. ----- /vgn.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan