Jayant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
High Court
03 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Jayant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Date of order
03 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Jayant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACriminal Miscellaneous No.22090 of 2013
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -859 Year- 2012 Thana -PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- PATNA
====================================================== Jayant Kumar S/O Janakdhari Prasad, Resident of Village - Vaishali, Ghaghara Building, Income Tax, P.S. Vaishali Delhi, District - Gaziyabad (U.P.)
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Smt. Pratima Kumari W/O Sachin Kumar, Resident of Mohalla - Janakdhari Lal Road Danapur Cant, P.S. Danapur Town, District Patna, at present residing at C/O Jawahar Prasad, Mohalla - East Nand Gola Madhawji Mills, P.S. Malsalami, District - Patna
.... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARORAL ORDER
2 03-07-2014
This application has been filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance dated 9.10.2012 passed by the learned Sub.Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, Patna in Complaint
Case No.859C of 2012.
On call nobody appears to press this application.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Md.S./-
(Ashutosh Kumar, J)
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.