Jayant Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
High Court
14 Jun 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jayant Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
14 Jun 2001
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Jayant Silk Mills Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- JAYANT SILK MILLS PVT LTD.Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 2 of 1986
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and
Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- JAYANT SILK MILLS PVT LTD.Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: NOTICE SERVED for Petitioner MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1
--------------------------------------------------------------
CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE
and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
Date of decision: 14/06/2001
ORAL JUDGEMENT
(Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE)
�At the instance of the assessee, Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench 'A' has referred the
following question for the opinion of this Court under
the provisions of sec. 256(1) of the Income-tax Act,
1961.
"Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the
case, the Tribunal erred in law in holding that
assessment order should not be annulled but set
aside?"
2.�When the matter is called out for hearing, nobody has appeared for the applicant-assessee, though the applicant has been duly served. Learned advocate Shri
has appeared for the applicant-assessee, though the applicant has been duly served. Learned advocate Shri B.B. Naik has appeared for the respondent revenue.
3.�In view of the fact that nobody has appeared for the applicant-assessee, at whose instance the question has been referred to this court, we decline to answer the question and we return the reference unanswered.
�The reference stands disposed of accordingly with
no order as to costs.
�����(A.R. Dave, J.)
�����(D.A. Mehta, J.)
(hn)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.