Case LawHigh Court › J.b. Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals Limit...

J.b. Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another

High Court 11 Jan 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
J.b. Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another
Date of order
11 Jan 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In J.b. Chemicals And Pharmaceuticals Limited v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1147 OF 2008 ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1150 OF 2008 J.B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited Versus Additional Commissioner of Income Tax & Another ..Appellant. ..Respondents. Mr.S.J. Mehta for the appellant.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan i/by Ms.Anamika Malhotra for the respondents. CORAM : J.P. Devadhar & Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, JJ. P.C. : DATE : 11[th] January, 2011. 1.These appeal were admitted on 6[th] October 2008 on the following substantial question of law : a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Tribunal was right in holding that the profits and gains on which deduction is allowed under Section 80IB, the whole of the income and turnover of the industrial undertaking the profits of which are eligible for deduction under Section 80IB, has to be excluded for computing profits and gains under Section 80HHC of the Act in view of Section 80IB (9) ? 2.Learned counsel on both the sides state that the aforesaid question of law have already been answered by this Court in the case of Associated Capsules Private Limited V/s. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (Income Tax Appeal No.3036 of 2010) decided on 10th January 2011 in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. 3.The Appeals are disposed off accordingly with a direction to the Tribunal to re-compute the deduction in the light of aforesaid decision of this Court. No order as to costs. (Mrs.Mridula Bhatkar, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan