Case LawHigh Court › J.d. Enterprises Private Limited v. Comm...

J.d. Enterprises Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xiv, Kolkata &Ors

High Court 15 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
J.d. Enterprises Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xiv, Kolkata &Ors
Date of order
15 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In J.d. Enterprises Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax – Xiv, Kolkata &Ors, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Consequently, the appeal relating toassessment year 2004-05 is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE O – 14 ITA/279/2009 J.D. ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITEDVERSUSCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – XIV, KOLKATA &ORS. BEFORE: The Hon'ble Justice SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI The Hon'ble Justice RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 15[th ]January 2024. Appearance: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvocateMr. Prithu Dudheria, Advocate… for respondents. 1.Case called out. No one appears for the appellant to press the appeal. 2.This is an old appeal pending in this Court for last more than 14 years.It has not yet been admitted. The only question raised in this appeal is as towhether the Tribunal has rightly confirmed disallowance of foreign travellingexpenses to the tune of Rs.8,98,708/- in terms of Section 37(1) of the IncomeTax Act, 1961. 3.We have perused the impugned order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal and we do not find any perversity in it. The findings recorded by theTribunal are findings of fact based on consideration of relevant material onrecord. The matter is concluded by concurrent finding of facts. 4. 4.In view of the aforesaid, we find that no substantial question of law isinvolved in the present appeal. Consequently, the appeal relating toassessment year 2004-05 is dismissed. (SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.) S. Kumar (RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan