Jda Consultancy Services Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1) Mumbai &Ors
High Court
26 Sep 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Jda Consultancy Services Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1) Mumbai &Ors
Date of order
26 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
2014-2015
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Jda Consultancy Services Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1) Mumbai &Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2023.09.2715:29:29+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.5184 OF 2022
Jda Consultancy Services Private Limited
Versus
Income Tax Officer Ward 6(3)(1) Mumbai &Ors.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
----
Mr. Suhrith Parthasarathy a/w Ms Amritha Sathyajith & Mr. Ram Narayan i/b Ms Shweta Sadanandan for Petitioner.Mr. Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents-Revenue.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & KAMAL KHATA, JJDATED : 26[th] SEPTEMBER 2023
P.C. :
1After the petition was heard for sometime and reply having been filed
to the petition, with the consent of the counsel we pass the following order:
a)The impugned notice dated 31[st] March 2021 and the assessment orderdated 31[st] March 2022 are hereby quashed and set aside.
b)The matter is remanded for denovo consideration from the stage ofdisposing the objections to reopening of file, to respondents to pass suchorder as they deem fit in accordance with law for A.Y-2014-2015.
c)Before passing any order, a personal hearing shall be given topetitioner, notice whereof shall be communicated at least five working daysin advance.
d)The order to be passed shall be a reasoned order dealing with allsubmissions of petitioner.
e)If the Assessing officer is going to rely on any judgments or orders of
any court or Tribunal, a list thereof shall also be provided alongwith thenotice for personal hearing, so that petitioner will be able to deal with thesame / distinguish the same during the personal hearing.
f)The entire proceedings to be completed by 31[st] December 2023.
2We clarify that we have not made any observation on the merits of the
matter.
3Petition disposed.
(KAMAL KHATA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.