Jhhc:24255-Db v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1 (Central), Kolkata
High Court
19 Aug 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Jhhc:24255-Db v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1 (Central), Kolkata
Date of order
19 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Jhhc:24255-Db v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-1 (Central), Kolkata, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Therefore, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy, this writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 4428 of 2025
Laxmi Business & Cement Company Private Limited, a Private Limited Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956/2013 having its office at Morangi, P.O & P.S- Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh, through its Director, Mr. Anupam Agrawal, aged about 55 years, son of Mr. Gyan Chand Agrawal, having his office at Morangi, P.O & P.S- Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh. … … … Petitioner
Versus
1. The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Range-1 (Central), Kolkata having its office at Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, E.M. By-pass, P.O- E.K.T, P.S-Anandapur, District-Kolkata-700107.
2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1(4), Kolkata having its office at Aayakar Bhawan Poorva, 110, Shantipally, E.M. By-pass, P.O- E.K.T, P.S-Anandapur, District-Kolkata-700107.
…
… … Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
---------
For the Petitioner:
Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate
Mr. Anish Kamal, Advocate
For the Respondents:
Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Sr. S.C.
Mr. Durgesh Agarwal, A.C. to Sr. S.C.
Ms. Saudamini Gupta, A.C. to Sr. S.C.
---------
02 /Dated: 19.08.2025
1. Heard.
2. Since the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy against the impugned assessment order dated 28.03.2025 passed by the 2[nd]respondent before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), and also because the order is passed by an officer at Kolkata, we are not inclined to entertain the writ petition.
3. Therefore, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedy, this writ petition is dismissed. Pending Interlocutory Application, if any, stands disposed of.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.