Case Law › High Court › Jhhc:27285-Db v. Principal Commissioner...

Jhhc:27285-Db v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pcit, Ranchi

High Court 09 Sep 2025 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · jhar_pg

Parties

Date of order

09 Sep 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Jhhc:27285-Db v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pcit, Ranchi, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Considering the said submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 2524 of 2022 M/S. Srivari Exims Pvt. Ltd., having its office at 540, Old Purulia Road, P.O. & P.S.-Mango, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, through one of its Directors, Ravi Mahesh Kumar, S/o Shri Ravi Shekhar, R/o near Flat B, 1st Floor, 43/3 Benoy Pally, P.O.-Bansdroni, P.S.-Regent Park, Tallygunj, District-Kolkata (West Bengal) ….. Petitioner ….. Petitioner Versus 1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, PCIT, Ranchi 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward No. 3 (1), Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum ….. Respondents ----- CORAM HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: For the Respondents: Mr. N.K. Pasari, Advocate Mr. Ratnesh Nandan Sahay, Advocate ----- 08/09.09.2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has got instruction not to press the present writ petition. 2. Considering the said submission, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. dismissed as not pressed. (TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.) (RAJESH SHANKAR, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.