Case LawHigh Court › Jitendra Singh v. Dated: 6[Th] January,...

Jitendra Singh v. Dated: 6[Th] January, 2022

High Court 06 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Jitendra Singh v. Dated: 6[Th] January, 2022
Date of order
06 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jitendra Singh v. Dated: 6[Th] January, 2022, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2882 of 2021 Jitendra Singh …..Petitioner Versus Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, DCIT/ACIT, Central Circle, Dehradun …Respondents Mr. Eshan Sachhdeva, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, learned counsel for the respondent. Dated: 6[th] January, 2022 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Petitioner is challenging the assessment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle, Dehradun. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the revenue submits that the order impugned in the writ petition is appealable before the CIT (Appeal) under Section 246 of Income Tax Act. 3. Since petitioner has statutory remedy of filing appeal, therefore, this Court declines to entertain this writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of alternative remedy. No order as to costs. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 06.01.2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan