Case LawHigh Court › Jivanlal Manilal Gor v. Commissioner Of...

Jivanlal Manilal Gor v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 28 Jun 2001 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Jivanlal Manilal Gor v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Jun 2001
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Jivanlal Manilal Gor v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2001) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ JIVANLAL MANILAL GOR Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RK PATEL WITH MR.B.D.KARIA for Applicant No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 74 of 1986 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and Sd/- Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO @ JIVANLAL MANILAL GOR Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: MR RK PATEL WITH MR.B.D.KARIA for Applicant No. 1 MR AKIL QURESHI WITH MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE and MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA Date of decision: 28/06/2001 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE A.R.DAVE) 1.�We have heard learned Advocate Mr. R.K.Patel, appearing for the assessee and learned Advocate Mr.Akil Qureshi for the Revenue. 2.�At the time of hearing of the Reference, learned Advocate Mr.R.K.Patel has submitted that he has been instructed by the assessee to withdraw the Reference. Accordingly, the assessee is permitted to withdraw the Reference, and therefore, we decline to answer the question referred to this Court. 3.�The Reference stands disposed of as unanswered with no order as to costs. ���Sd/-��Sd/- ��(A.R.Dave, J)�(D.A.Mehta, J) m.m.bhatt�
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan