Joban Dass v. The Assistant Commissioner Income Tax And Others
High Court
24 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
Joban Dass v. The Assistant Commissioner Income Tax And Others
Date of order
24 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Joban Dass v. The Assistant Commissioner Income Tax And Others, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLACWP No.706 of 2016.
Decided on: May 24, 2016.
Joban Dass
...Petitioner.
VERSUS The Assistant Commissioner Income Tax and others
…Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr.Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr.Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Diwan Singh Negi, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. Ms.Devyani Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, C.J. (Oral)
It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in this writ petition was also the subject matter of batch of writ petitions the lead case of which was CWP No.460 of 2014, decided on 3[rd] June, 2015.
2. In view of the above, we deem it proper to dispose of the instant writ petition in terms of the decision supra by directing the respondents to refund the tax amount as per the Rules occupying the field. Ordered accordingly.
3.Pending CMPs, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir)
Chief Justice.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue