Case LawHigh Court › J.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer 6(...

J.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer 6(3)(2

High Court 21 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
J.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer 6(3)(2
Date of order
21 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In J.rajagopal v. The Income Tax Officer 6(3)(2, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1390 OF 2008ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.955 OF 2008 J.Rajagopal Vs. The Income Tax Officer 6(3)(2) ..Appellant ..Respondent Ms.Asifa Khan for the Appellant.Mr.A.D.Kango for the Respondent. CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &SANTOSH BORA, JJ. DATE : 21ST APRIL, 2008 the Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission in the month of September,2008, subject to numbering. (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (SANTOSH BORA,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan