Jt. Venture Of Shri Rasiklal A. Sanghvi & Shri Anish v. Shah
High Court
17 Dec 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Jt. Venture Of Shri Rasiklal A. Sanghvi & Shri Anish v. Shah
Date of order
17 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Jt. Venture Of Shri Rasiklal A. Sanghvi & Shri Anish v. Shah, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1462 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Jt. Venture of Shri Rasiklal A. Sanghvi & Shri Anish V. Shah..Respondent.
ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1493 OF 2009
Shri Rasiklal A. Sanghvi
..Appellant.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Respondent.
Mrs. Padma Divekar for appellant / revenue.
Mr. P. Toprani for respondent / assessee.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH DECEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
1.Heard learned counsel for the revenue and learned counsel for the respondent / assessee in both the appeals. Mr. Rasiklal, the respondent in ITXA No.1493 of 2009 has filed an affidavit stating therein that the assessing officer assessed the profits separately as joint venture business in the status of A.O.P. and the same has been accepted by him even though as per declaration made under section 132(4) and in the block return, he had
included profit from joint venture in his individual returns. Learned counsel appearing for the revenue submits that in view of the affidavit, the question sought to be raised in this appeal does not arise since the assessee has been assessed in the status of A.O.P. The affidavit filed by Rasiklal is taken on record.
2.So far as the other questions are concerned, we do not find any fault in the view taken by the Tribunal. In this view of the matter, no substantial question of law arise in these appeals. The appeals are, therefore, dismissed in limini with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.